
So Prime Minister John Key is telling those taken aback by the possible return of youth rates to hold their horses.
There's talk of the reintroduction of an $8 per your youth rate - with the modern definition of youth being anyone under the age of 25.
Key and his Labour Minister Kate Wilkinson seem to be playing that favourite of Tory games - throw out the worst possible scenario, then when you drop your intended policy it seems like a you're being compassionate and listening to the electorate.
On the Stuff website Key was quoted as saying 'youth rates were a "theoretical possibility" but not a "high probability".'
Which means we'll go there if we think we can get away with it.
Apparently paying young people less is an important tool in tackling youth unemployment.
Actually in times of high unemployment youth rates just give employers a reason to dump workers when they come of age and sign up another batch of freshies.
Yeah, but surely employers wouldn't go down that road you say.
It would be a waste of the money they invest in training etc.
Well, I used to work for a newspaper where we often took calls from fast food workers who suddenly found themselves getting out and being assigned fewer and fewer shifts once they were due an age-related pay rise.
National's 90-day employment trial period legislation makes it even easier for bosses to do it too.
Actually seeing youth rate supporter, ACT founder and current MP, Sir Roger Douglas interviewed on television drew me to the conclusion we should forget youth rates and perhaps introduce a seniors rate.
Sir Roger looked like he'd just been woken up.
After all, if you can't lift or carry as much as your younger colleagues, or like a bit of a mid afternoon siesta, perhaps that should be reflected in your pay packet.
The money saved could be redistributed to job creation at the other end of the scale.
Extreme?
Well, I'm just throwing it against the wall to see if it sticks.